I'm sorry if some people took my comments to be mean-spirited or divisive. It was not meant that way. Perhaps I did not express myself well.
I meant to make two points. Yesterday, a large group of cyclists took to Old Marshall Hwy (OMH) to honour two fallen riders who were killed when a motorist in a large haulage vehicle crossed the yellow center line and collided with them. These are indisputable facts. The estimate is that this procession, during which time NO VEHICLES PASSED US, contained over 200 riders. Why did no vehicles pass? Because we had numbers. And you need numbers if you want to advocate for change. That was my first point. If we want change, we need to show up and express ourselves. My second point was my own disappointment that I saw very few BRBC jerseys in this procession. Perhaps there were more BRBC members there wearing other jerseys (as I did), but in a club this size, it was disappointing *to me* that I saw so few. There's a saying that "if you aren't at the table, you may be on the menu." IMO, cyclists are "on the menu" (just look at some of the comments on the WLOS news story), and if BRBC wishes to advocate for change, it needs to make its presence known. End of story.
Mr. Thomas is proposing an advocacy below for a better corridor for cyclists between Asheville and Marshall. I think this is admirable, but I also think it is a big rock to push up the hill. I have doubts as to its feasibility given the terrain and current existing infrastructure. Sam White from Liberty Bikes pointed out yesterday that cyclists have been using OMH for over 40 years but that we are getting pushed off it, just as we are getting pushed off of many of the roads that have been used for years by cyclists in other areas. Even if a cycling corridor could be made along OMH, we will have likely been pushed aside long before that happens. In the meantime, I think we *could* advocate for some changes that would make OMH safer for cyclists and prevent us from being pushed off of it..
- Greater police presence and enforcement of existing speed limits. Of course, this would mean that cyclists would also have to obey the law. It is a two-way street. I rarely have seen law enforcement on OMH, and I've never seen anyone stopped although vehicles routinely travel along that road at speeds much higher than the posted limits and often pass cyclists and other vehicles in an unsafe manner.
- Limits on vehicle sizes (I'm looking at you, big black debris trucks hauling big black debris trailers). There has been an observable increase in vehicle size and volume since Helene. IMO, this needs to be curbed.
- Limits on usage of the road by large vehicles during specific periods. Ever wonder why there are fewer large vehicles on OMH on Saturday afternoons and Sundays. The landfill is closed. Although one would have considered that the time at which the two young men were killed would have also been safe... the landfill closed over 2 hours before! I would propose limiting large trucks on OMH on Saturdays, too, although smaller hauling trucks would not have the same restrictions.
- Longer term, create an alternative access to the landfill for trucks to take them off of OMH.
My own observation is that OMH was never meant to carry the type and volume of truck traffic that it currently hosts. But then, Buncombe County put its landfill near it, and here we are. The landfill isn't going to move in the near future, nor is more cycling infrastructure going to be built. But there are things that can be done in the short term that would make cycling OMH much safer. I'm sure there are others with better ideas. Just throwing a few things out there.
Sorry to pontificate, and I'm sorry if I offended anyone with my earlier post. I agree with Mr. Thomas that in areas in which roads are being expanded to accommodate housing and commercial growth, BRBC *should* be advocating for these roads to include accommodations for cyclists. This recommendations above are specific to OMH although better law enforcement applies everywhere.
If you've made it this far, thanks for reading, and I would appreciate not being flamed. :-)